Embracing Natural Law and Objective Moral Principles
A Lighthouse in the sea of chaos and immorality
Natural law is an ethical theory that posits the existence of certain moral principles that are inherent in the nature of human beings and the world around us. These principles are considered to be universally binding, regardless of culture or individual beliefs. Proponents of natural law, such as Thomas Aquinas and John Locke, argue that these principles can be discerned through reason and reflection on human nature.
By incorporating natural law into the conversation, we can construct a framework for immoral acts. These acts can be considered contrary to natural law because they violate the fundamental principles of human nature, such as the inherent value of human life, the right to personal autonomy, and the importance of truth.
Murder: Murder is the intentional taking of another person's life without just cause. According to natural law, every human life has intrinsic value and dignity. Therefore, murder goes against the natural order by violating the sanctity of life.
Rape: Rape involves non-consensual sexual acts, which are a violation of an individual's autonomy and dignity. Natural law emphasizes the importance of personal freedom and self-determination, so rape is fundamentally immoral.
Assault: Assault infringes on a person's physical integrity and autonomy. Natural law holds that individuals have the right to be free from harm and coercion, so any act of violence or aggression against another person is contrary to these principles.
Theft: Theft involves taking someone's property without their consent. According to natural law, individuals have the right to own and manage their possessions. Therefore, theft is immoral because it undermines the natural right to property.
Coercion: Coercion involves using force or threats to compel someone to act against their will. This violates the principle of personal autonomy and self-determination found in natural law, making coercion morally wrong.
Willful lying: Willful lying is the deliberate act of deceiving others or presenting false information. Natural law emphasizes the importance of truth and honesty in human interactions. Consequently, willful lying goes against the natural order by undermining trust and the pursuit of knowledge.
By identifying these acts as contrary to the principles of natural law, we can construct an objective moral guide that emphasizes the inherent value of human life, the importance of personal autonomy, and the pursuit of truth. This framework can serve as a foundation for shaping individual and societal moral perspectives and fostering a more just and ethical world.
In my opinion, Natural Law defines without ambiguity what immoral acts are. From that framework, let us construct an objective morality compass and map that disambiguates subjective morality.
Based on the natural law framework, we can construct an objective morality by establishing moral principles that are universal and grounded in the inherent nature of human beings. These principles will be the foundation for judging actions as morally right or wrong, regardless of cultural or personal beliefs. Here are some key principles derived from natural law:
Sanctity of human life: Every human life has intrinsic value and dignity. This principle requires that we respect and protect human life in all its forms, from conception to natural death. Actions that intentionally harm or end human life, such as murder and euthanasia, are considered morally wrong.
Personal autonomy and self-determination: Individuals have the right to make choices and decisions about their own lives, as long as they do not infringe upon the rights and well-being of others. This principle implies that actions such as rape, assault, and coercion are morally wrong, as they violate the autonomy of others.
Property rights: Individuals have the right to own and manage their possessions. This principle supports the idea that theft and fraud are morally wrong, as they undermine the natural right to property.
Truth and honesty: Truth is essential for the proper functioning of society and human relationships. This principle implies that actions like willful lying and deception are morally wrong, as they undermine trust and the pursuit of knowledge.
Social harmony and justice: Human beings are social creatures who naturally form communities and societies. This principle requires that we work towards creating a just and harmonious society where the rights and well-being of all individuals are protected and promoted.
Compassion and empathy: Recognizing the feelings and needs of others is a fundamental aspect of human nature. This principle encourages us to practice empathy and compassion, treating others with kindness and understanding.
By adhering to these moral principles derived from natural law, individuals and societies can foster an objective morality that transcends subjective preferences and cultural differences. This objective morality offers a stable foundation for ethical behavior and decision-making, promoting human flourishing and well-being.
It is important to note, however, that implementing and upholding an objective morality can be challenging in practice. Different cultures and societies might interpret and apply these principles in various ways, and individual circumstances may sometimes present moral dilemmas that require careful consideration and reflection. Despite these challenges, the pursuit of an objective morality based on natural law remains a valuable endeavour for individuals and societies alike.
We will let our readers decide if the manifesto helps us guide ourselves out of the darkness bearing down on us, through subjective morality service to self-interest which are in truth are leading us all to accept anti-human agendas and policies, being driven by no moral principles, compass or map.